caught speeding by following
Hi I just got a speeding ticket. Cop caught the guy in front of me on
radar going 76 and because I was behing him he says I was speeding also but put on the ticket I was going between 70-75. Does anybody think I can fight this ticket, since I was never caught on radar? Also isn't the cop contraticting himself when he clocks the guy in front at 76, and says I must have been going 70-75? Also he asked the driver in front of me if I was following him and apparently he said I was close behind him therefore that's why he was speeding. The way I see it if the cop had to ask questions to the driver in front of me, and gives me a ticket less than him, doesn't that say he is uncertain of me speeding. If anybody has any arguments or experiences in a similar situation, please respond. Don't mind paying the ticket it's loosing points I don't like. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
> So the cop was ahead, and measured the speed of the car in front
> of you, but not your speed. > > You have a great chance of having your ticket dismissed. The cop pulled > the charge out of his fat ass. What makes you think that judges and magistrates base their traffic decisions on facts? |
223rem wrote: > wrote: > > > Hi I just got a speeding ticket. Cop caught the guy in front of me on > > radar going 76 and because I was behing him he says I was speeding also > > but put on the ticket I was going between 70-75. > > He pulled you over first, and then he pulled over the > guy in front? I've always wondered how a cop can > pull over 2 cars. > > > Does anybody think I can fight this ticket, since I was never caught on > > radar? Also isn't the cop contraticting himself when he clocks the guy > > in front at 76, and says I must have been going 70-75? Also he asked > > the driver in front of me if I was following him and apparently he said > > I was close behind him therefore that's why he was speeding. > > The way I see it if the cop had to ask questions to the driver in front > > of me, and gives me a ticket less than him, doesn't that say he is > > uncertain of me speeding. If anybody has any arguments or experiences > > in a similar situation, please respond. Don't mind paying the ticket > > it's loosing points I don't like. > > Thanks in advance. > > So the cop was ahead, and measured the speed of the car in front > of you, but not your speed. > > You have a great chance of having your ticket dismissed. The cop pulled > the charge out of his fat ass. He did? Let's see. He radars a car and observes another going at the same or very similar speed behind him. That testimony by itself is sufficient. He then asks the lead to corroborate his observation. That gives two bits of evidence for the court rather than just the cop's. Slam dunk, guilty. Harry K |
Harry K wrote:
> Let's see. He radars a car and observes another going at the > same or very similar speed behind him. We don't know what the legal speed was in this situation. We've been told that 76 is apparently over the limit (not sure why the cop told the 2'nd driver what the first driver was clocked at). Cop tells 2'nd driver that he must have been doing 70-75. What is legal speed? Is it 65? What was the visual angle between the cop and the road, and how far away were the cars when the reading and estimate were made? Cop is on shaky ground if he claims he can gauge speed of a car driving towards him at a narrow angle. I would argue that by the time the cop clocks the first car and puts the gun down and changes his focus to the second car, the first car has slowed down (by 5 mph? 10?). He sees the distance between the cars are still increasing (perhaps very slowly), but because the first car isin't going 76 any more his judgement regarding how fast the second car is going is now in question. Combine that with a narrow-angle observation and you've got pure speculation on the part of the cop. What was the terrain of the road in the area in question? Did both cars come over a hill or around an obstructed curve immediately before the cop gunned the first car? How far back could the cop observe both cars travelling in tandem? |
Harry K wrote:
> He did? Let's see. He radars a car and observes another going at the > same or very similar speed behind him. His view of the following car was blocked by the car in front. > sufficient. He then asks the lead to corroborate his observation. That > gives two bits of evidence for the court rather than just the cop's. > Slam dunk, guilty. The witness is not qualified to visually estimate speeds. More interestingly, how does a single cop car pull over 2 vehicles?? |
>
> The witness is not qualified to visually estimate speeds. > > More interestingly, how does a single cop car pull over 2 > vehicles?? By running one of them off the road. Happened to me many years ago . . . had a local cop come around a blind corner and then crossed all the way over the center line (with all four wheels) into my lane, forcing me all the way off the road (to avoid a head-on with a police cruiser IN MY LANE), where I darn near wrapped my car around a big tree . . . then he pulled over a station wagon headed the opposite direction. Silly me thought the cop had briefly lost control of his vehicle, and there was no harm done (really), so I put my car back on the road and continued about my business. Later, I was darn near arrested and hauled off to jail for fleeing from the same cop who -claimed- he was trying to pull me over when he ran me off the road. (like I was supposed to know somehow that ATTEMPTED MURDER is a valid way to stop someone for an alleged minor traffic violation 50/40???) -Dave |
> He did? Let's see. He radars a car and observes another going at the
> same or very similar speed behind him. That testimony by itself is > sufficient. He then asks the lead to corroborate his observation. That > gives two bits of evidence for the court rather than just the cop's. > Slam dunk, guilty. Only if the lead driver is present when the poster goes to trial. Otherwise quoting him would be hearsay; probable result - DISMISSED! |
thanks for all your replies. I see there are a few questions being
asked. First the cop was standing on the side of the road with the radar in his hand. Therefore as we approached he told us both to pull over. He showed me his radar gun which clocked 76, but said that was the guy in front of me. We both came over a hill then a curve. The speed limit is 50 but if I can proove I was going under 70 I can still get fined but no points lost. Thanks |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com