So You Think You Want Computer Controlled Steering
Item: Software glitches cause Toyota Prius to stall at highway speeds:
http://money.cnn.com/2005/05/16/Auto...ex.htm?cnn=yes Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to do a hard left at highway speeds. Dave Head |
>
> Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to do a > hard left at highway speeds. > > Dave Head Microsoft? Gives a whole new meaning to 'software crash'. Now, that was totally unfair to Microsoft, lots other software crashes, they just lead the field in that area. |
wtrplnet wrote: > > > > Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to > do a > > hard left at highway speeds. > > > > Dave Head > > Microsoft? Gives a whole new meaning to 'software crash'. Now, that was > totally unfair to Microsoft, lots other software crashes, they just lead the > field in that area. I miss my 1983 Ford all of a sudden. Dave |
On Tue, 17 May 2005 00:32:27 -0700, "wtrplnet" <alan.s AT REMOVE Spam
intertrader.net> wrote: >> >> Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to >do a >> hard left at highway speeds. >> >> Dave Head > >Microsoft? Gives a whole new meaning to 'software crash'. Now, that was >totally unfair to Microsoft, lots other software crashes, they just lead the >field in that area. Well, its probably because they _do_ more software than any other company. Sit back and never write a lick of code, and your code isn't going to crash. You'd want a team like the one that writes software for the space shuttle to write software for a computer controlled steering function, and you'd want triple redundant hardware to ensure reliability. And you'd want mandatory servicing of the mechanism only by people qualified to ensure that they knew all the failure modes and how to avoid them. I think its too steep a set of requirements just to do the same job done by mechanical means cheaply and reliably. Mechanical steering is extremely reliable. It'd be really expensive to match that reliability with a computer system. Dave Head > |
> You'd want a team like the one that writes software for the space
shuttle to > write software for a computer controlled steering function, and you'd want > triple redundant hardware to ensure reliability. And you'd want mandatory > servicing of the mechanism only by people qualified to ensure that they knew > all the failure modes and how to avoid them. And the same people that demand all of that will demand it doesn't add a cent to the cost of the car. |
"Dave Head" > wrote in message ... > Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to do a > hard left at highway speeds. Hold on a minute... no car yet has that kind of steering system. The electric power steering in a few models of cars uses an electric motor instead of a hydraulic pump to provide steering boost, but there's still a physical shaft conected to the wheels. It's no more likely to fail or cause erratic steering than a hydraulic pump. The closest to what you are talking about is found in some newer stability control setups. In an extreme skid, the steering wheel will apply a slight "suggestion" of counter steering force to the wheel. |
"Magnulus" > wrote
> "Dave Head" > wrote >> Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to > do a >> hard left at highway speeds. > > Hold on a minute... no car yet has that kind of steering system. The > electric power steering in a few models of cars uses an electric motor > instead of a hydraulic pump to provide steering boost, but there's still a > physical shaft conected to the wheels. It's no more likely to fail or > cause > erratic steering than a hydraulic pump. > > The closest to what you are talking about is found in some newer > stability > control setups. In an extreme skid, the steering wheel will apply a > slight > "suggestion" of counter steering force to the wheel. You are incorrect. BMWs' "Active Steering" uses an computer controlled electric motor that turns a planetary gearset to amplify the steering input to the hydraulics. It is programmed to give a wide range of variable-ratios at different speeds, and does give a little opposite lock in oversteer conditions, as you say. Although it might be capable of going out of control; it's not at all exposed to hacking because the computer in control is the DSC/ABS computer and that's not exposed to the outside world. Floyd |
"Magnulus" > wrote in message ... > > "Dave Head" > wrote in message > ... >> Now think about a computer programming error that causes the steering to > do a >> hard left at highway speeds. > > Hold on a minute... no car yet has that kind of steering system. The > electric power steering in a few models of cars uses an electric motor > instead of a hydraulic pump to provide steering boost, but there's still a > physical shaft conected to the wheels. It's no more likely to fail or > cause > erratic steering than a hydraulic pump. > > The closest to what you are talking about is found in some newer > stability > control setups. In an extreme skid, the steering wheel will apply a > slight > "suggestion" of counter steering force to the wheel. > > There are cars that have fly by wire steering... New Lexus GS is one of those, I believe. |
Dave Head wrote:
> Well, its probably because they _do_ more software than any other company. Sit > back and never write a lick of code, and your code isn't going to crash. Yes, they "do" more software than anybody, sadly quality control and security they don't do. They have managed to create multi-billion dollar industries in companies trying to cover their defects, though |
"fbloogyudsr" > writes:
>"Magnulus" > wrote >> "Dave Head" > wrote >>> Now think about a computer programming error that causes the >>> steering to do a hard left at highway speeds. >> Hold on a minute... no car yet has that kind of steering system. >> The electric power steering in a few models of cars uses an >> electric motor instead of a hydraulic pump to provide steering >> boost, but there's still a physical shaft conected to the wheels. >> It's no more likely to fail or cause erratic steering than a >> hydraulic pump. >> The closest to what you are talking about is found in some newer >> stability control setups. In an extreme skid, the steering wheel >> will apply a slight "suggestion" of counter steering force to the >> wheel. >You are incorrect. BMWs' "Active Steering" uses an computer >controlled electric motor that turns a planetary gearset to amplify >the steering input to the hydraulics. It is programmed to give a >wide range of variable-ratios at different speeds, and does give a >little opposite lock in oversteer conditions, as you say. >Although it might be capable of going out of control; it's not at >all exposed to hacking because the computer in control is the >DSC/ABS computer and that's not exposed to the outside world. Less concerned about hacking than the general competence of design and inclusion of "failsafes". vis: http://www.autobild.de/aktuell/neuhe...rtikel_id=7348 Summary: A Berlin Police BMW 5 series (E39) went out of control for unexplained reasons late last year. The driver was sent back to driver training school. Something didn't gel so media investigators went out and did some testing. When they hit the brake pedal too hard, (with only about 700 to 900 N force) it caused the ABS/DSC to be disabled... and it remained disabled until the car was turned off, the windows closed and the car locked using the remote control. (Sound familiar?) The brake pedal force sensor also believes that a load equivalent to 120kg is "implausible". -- /"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia \ / ASCII ribbon campaign | I'm a .signature virus! X against HTML mail | Copy me into your ~/.signature / \ and postings | to help me spread! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com