AutoBanter

AutoBanter (http://www.autobanter.com/index.php)
-   Ford Mustang (http://www.autobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   What a WORTHLESS effort... (http://www.autobanter.com/showthread.php?t=26528)

RichA March 9th 05 09:31 PM

What a WORTHLESS effort...
 
Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.

http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html

SVTKate March 9th 05 10:51 PM

Woah!
That one wouldn't look good enough to take home at closing time.


"RichA" > wrote in message
...
| Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
|
| http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html



Hucklebuck March 9th 05 11:31 PM

Dodge's answer to the new GTO... too bad it will have the same fate.
Butt ugly with poor sales and soon to be off the market... again!


RichA wrote:
> Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>
> http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html


WindsorFox[SS] March 9th 05 11:43 PM

RichA wrote:
> Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>
> http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html



Looks good to me. I see lines from the early 70's B and E body
cars in it. I like all but the tail lights. And I'd like to see them
do something more diagonal on the head lights like the late 50's and
early 60's Chryslers.

--
2.3Sleeper: "Anyone know how to disable the daytime
running lights on a 2001 Crown Vic or on a 2002 GMC?"

SVTKate: "A ball peen hammer?"

[email protected] March 10th 05 01:57 AM

RichA wrote:
> Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>
> http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html


I said it befo why can't they just give us the Nascar body style:
http://www.allpar.com/model/images/c...ASCAR-team.jpg ?

180 Out


RichA March 10th 05 04:41 AM

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:43:27 -0600, "WindsorFox[SS]"
> wrote:

>RichA wrote:
>> Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>>
>> http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html

>
>
> Looks good to me. I see lines from the early 70's B and E body
>cars in it. I like all but the tail lights. And I'd like to see them
>do something more diagonal on the head lights like the late 50's and
>early 60's Chryslers.


The early 60's Chryslers were hideious. They just had good engines.
-Rich

RichA March 10th 05 04:42 AM

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:58:24 -0500, ZombyWoof >
wrote:

>On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:31:57 -0500, RichA > wrote
>something wonderfully witty:
>
>>Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>>
>>http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html
>>

>Looks more like a current generation Monte Carlo.


Except the ultimate sin. It has four doors. F------
family piece of CRAP. The new Monte Carlo with a
300hp V8 is actually not too bad at all.
-Rich

Rick Olive March 10th 05 05:32 AM

RichA wrote:
> Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>
> http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html

ugggghhhhh..... That's how they follow up the 300M?? Someone's smoking
crack.

RichA March 10th 05 07:39 AM

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:32:15 -0800, Rick Olive
> wrote:

>RichA wrote:
>> Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>>
>> http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html

>ugggghhhhh..... That's how they follow up the 300M?? Someone's smoking
>crack.


Might as well take the Magnum wagon, at least it has some utility.
-Rich

[email protected] March 10th 05 01:29 PM

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:31:57 -0500, RichA > wrote:

>Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.
>
>http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/dodge-charger.html


Yuck. That's just plain old ugly.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Okie Tom - TS #62

1998 GT Coupe 5-spd.
2001 Ranger XLT
www.bluestanggt.corral.net


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com