On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. And this proves...what, now? DS |
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. And this proves...what, now? DS |
You're damned right I do. And I would if I could.
Kevin DeAngelis wrote: > Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand > to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky.... > > > "Wound Up" > wrote in message > ... > >>Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions >>based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe >>you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite, >>intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity. >> >>Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys, >>etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people" >>included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only. >> >>So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to >>make any sense now? >> >>Kevin DeAngelis wrote: >> >>>The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw >>>newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He >>>(or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and >>>there have been no replies. >>> >>>I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than >>>Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still >>>do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they >>>could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the >>>days.... >>> >>> >>>"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message ngin.umich.edu... >>> >>> >>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>>>hate. >>>>>> >>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>>>>of Mairca). >>>>> >>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>>target of hatred ;) >>>> >>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >>> >>> >>> > > |
You're damned right I do. And I would if I could.
Kevin DeAngelis wrote: > Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand > to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky.... > > > "Wound Up" > wrote in message > ... > >>Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions >>based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe >>you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite, >>intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity. >> >>Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys, >>etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people" >>included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only. >> >>So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to >>make any sense now? >> >>Kevin DeAngelis wrote: >> >>>The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw >>>newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He >>>(or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and >>>there have been no replies. >>> >>>I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than >>>Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still >>>do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they >>>could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the >>>days.... >>> >>> >>>"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message ngin.umich.edu... >>> >>> >>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>>>hate. >>>>>> >>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>>>>of Mairca). >>>>> >>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>>target of hatred ;) >>>> >>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >>> >>> >>> > > |
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message n.umich.edu... > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote: > >> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. > > And this proves...what, now? > > DS That gays can be just as illogical as straights of course. Peter |
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message n.umich.edu... > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote: > >> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. > > And this proves...what, now? > > DS That gays can be just as illogical as straights of course. Peter |
Wound Up wrote:
> indago wrote: > >> 041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: >> >> >>> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>> hate. >>>> >>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd >>>> States of >>>> Mairca). >>> >>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>> target of hatred ;) >> >> Well, then, maybe derision??? > > That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose not > to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. > > I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some "vile > lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all said "it > would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were straight". > Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic term) in a more > heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew people from many > different walks of life, and had friends from many of them. I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. :) |
Wound Up wrote:
> indago wrote: > >> 041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: >> >> >>> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>> hate. >>>> >>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd >>>> States of >>>> Mairca). >>> >>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>> target of hatred ;) >> >> Well, then, maybe derision??? > > That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose not > to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. > > I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some "vile > lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all said "it > would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were straight". > Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic term) in a more > heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew people from many > different walks of life, and had friends from many of them. I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. :) |
>> That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose
>> not to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. >> >> I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some >> "vile lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all >> said "it would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were >> straight". Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic >> term) in a more heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew >> people from many different walks of life, and had friends from many of >> them. > > > I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. :) I'm quite sure it does. Take a look- http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterogeneous |
>> That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose
>> not to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. >> >> I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some >> "vile lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all >> said "it would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were >> straight". Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic >> term) in a more heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew >> people from many different walks of life, and had friends from many of >> them. > > > I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. :) I'm quite sure it does. Take a look- http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterogeneous |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com